The Procurement OS: Seven Claude AI Skills for the Full Source-to-Contract Lifecycle
The Procurement OS is a Claude AI plugin we originally built for our consulting clients. Seven procurement skills (spend analysis, category strategy, RFP generation, response evaluation, supplier scorecards, negotiation, and contract management) in one installable bundle. We have now made it free and public for the wider procurement community.
Introduction
What we built, why we built it, and what to do with itThe Molecule One Procurement OS is a free Claude AI plugin that gives procurement teams six production-ready skills covering source-to-contract, from spend analysis to negotiation, with a seventh (Contract Management) in internal testing and coming very soon. Until now, we used these skills exclusively with our consulting clients. They are what we build and deploy when we work with CPOs to implement AI across procurement functions. We have now decided to make them public, in the interest of the larger procurement community.
Over the past few months, every engagement we ran across manufacturing, financial services, retail, and professional services started with the same six workflows: categorise spend, build a category strategy, write the RFP, evaluate responses, score suppliers, prepare for the negotiation. We kept rebuilding these skills from scratch for each client. Eventually we packaged them into a single Claude plugin that any procurement team can install and run in minutes, on Claude Code or Claude Cowork. No developer skills required.
This article covers what each skill does, how they chain together into a coherent procurement workflow, and how to install and run them. If you have already read The Claude Cowork Playbook for Procurement Teams, you can think of this as the working operating system that the playbook described in the abstract. If you want to understand how to implement AI in procurement more broadly, start there.
The Procurement OS is seven AI procurement skills bundled into one Claude plugin (six live, one in testing). Previously used exclusively with our consulting clients, now available free for all procurement teams. Each skill solves one well-defined procurement problem and produces a usable artifact: a spend cube, an RFP, a scorecard, or a negotiation playbook. Skills can be used standalone or chained end-to-end. Install once, use forever. Join the waitlist for the full Source-to-Pay OS launching soon.
The rest of this document is structured for two reading paths. If you want the why, read sections 1 through 3. If you want the how, jump to sections 4 through 12 and use the sidebar to navigate to whichever skill you need today. If you just want to install it, section 13 has the download link.
The procurement-AI fragmentation problem
Why most teams' AI work in 2026 is producing less value than it shouldMost procurement teams using AI today are using it the way you would use a calculator: pull it out for a discrete task, get the answer, put it away. McKinsey research consistently shows that the procurement functions delivering the most value from AI are the ones treating it as infrastructure, not as a tool. Someone uses ChatGPT to summarise a contract. Someone else uses Claude to draft an RFP cover letter. The category lead has a private prompt library for spend questions that nobody else knows exists. None of it is connected. None of it is repeatable. Each prompt starts from zero.
This is not nothing. It is faster than not using AI at all. But it is structurally limited in three ways:
1. No methodology
Each prompt encodes one person's preferred approach. The next person uses a different one. Outputs are not comparable across analysts, across categories, or across quarters. There is no shared definition of "good."
2. No memory
Every conversation starts fresh. Yesterday's spend categorisation has to be re-explained today. The taxonomy debate from last quarter has to be re-litigated. Your settings, conventions, and prior decisions evaporate at the end of every session.
3. No chain
The output of the spend analysis doesn't feed into the category strategy. The category strategy doesn't feed into the RFP. The RFP doesn't feed into the scorecard. Each artifact is built in isolation from the others, even though procurement work is end-to-end by nature.
4. No defensibility
When stakeholders ask "how did you arrive at this number?", the answer is often a prompt the analyst typed once and didn't save. There is no audit trail, no reproducible process, no way to show your working.
The result is what we have been calling the procurement-AI fragmentation problem. Teams have access to capable AI, but the work product they get out of it is uneven, inconsistent, and difficult to defend. The technology is doing well. The operating model around it is doing badly.
Across teams we worked with in the last twelve months, the pattern was nearly universal: heavy individual use of AI, light-to-zero shared infrastructure. Skill files, structured prompts, and workflows that one person could hand to another were the exception, not the norm.
From scattered prompts to an OS
What changes when you move from prompts to skillsWhen we started building AI workflows for procurement clients, we quickly learned that the right unit of procurement AI is not the prompt. It is the skill. A skill is a structured, reusable workflow with its own configuration, its own templates, its own guardrails, and its own outputs. You install it once and use it forever. The next person on your team uses the same one. The methodology is shared, the memory is persistent, and the outputs are consistent.
The Procurement OS is seven of those skills, designed and tested as a set, packaged as a single plugin. We built these skills originally for client engagements. We are releasing them publicly because the procurement community deserves access to the same methodology we use with our consulting clients.
What an OS gives you that a stack of prompts doesn't
| Dimension | Scattered prompts | The Procurement OS |
|---|---|---|
| Methodology | Whatever the user typed | Encoded in each skill: Kraljic, RAG ratings, weighted scoring, BATNA analysis |
| Configuration | Re-explained every session | Set once on first run, persists in config.json |
| Outputs | Inconsistent format | Templated Word and Excel artifacts, ready to share |
| Chaining | Manual copy-paste between conversations | Outputs of one skill feed directly into the next |
| Audit trail | Lost when the chat closes | Every artifact has a written rationale and reproducible inputs |
| Onboarding | Each new analyst rebuilds their own prompts | Install once, hand to the next person |
This is the same shift you would make if you were going from spreadsheets-as-data-pipelines to a real ETL tool. The work is the same. The infrastructure around the work changes. And once that infrastructure exists, you stop spending energy on the parts of the workflow that don't deserve any.
Seven skills, one workflow
The skills, in the order procurement work actually runsThe seven skills cover the Source-to-Contract lifecycle in the order you would normally run it: from understanding spend, through category planning and sourcing, to supplier management and live negotiation.
Seven Claude AI skills covering the full source-to-contract lifecycle. Download the plugin bundle and install in under 5 minutes.
Each skill is built to stand alone. You can run the Spend Analyzer on its own without ever touching the others. You can use the Negotiation Playbook Generator the night before a renewal call without ever having run a single line of spend through the Spend Analyzer. They are independently useful.
But the design intent is that you also run them in sequence when the work calls for it. The output of Spend Analyzer becomes the input of Category Strategy Builder. The category strategy informs the RFP. The RFP defines the criteria the Response Evaluator scores against. The selected supplier feeds the Scorecard Engine. The supplier's performance, plus the original commercial terms, feed the Negotiation Playbook for the renewal. End to end.
At a glance
Spend Analyzer
Categorise raw spend data, surface savings opportunities, and produce a CFO-ready report from any export.
Category Strategy Builder
Run a Kraljic segmentation, build supply market intelligence, and propose savings levers ranked by effort and impact.
RFP Generator
Turn a brief, contract, or SOW into an issuable RFP, RFI, or RFQ, plus the supplier cover letter and scoring template.
RFP Response Evaluator
Score and compare supplier responses side-by-side against weighted criteria, with a ranked recommendation.
Supplier Scorecard Engine
Build, run, and report on supplier scorecards with RAG ratings, trend lines, and improvement plans.
Negotiation Playbook Generator
Build a structured playbook with BATNA, lever sequencing, counter-proposal language, and a one-page briefing card.
Contract Management
Review contracts, extract key clauses, track obligations, and set renewal alerts. Currently in internal testing.
What about Contract Management?
You will have noticed that the seven skills listed above cover Source-to-Contract but stop short of the contract itself. That is deliberate. The Contract Management skill is in internal testing right now, but it needs more work before it is ready for a general audience. Contract review, clause extraction, obligation tracking, and renewal alerting all behave differently across industries and jurisdictions, and we want to get this right rather than ship something half-finished. It is coming very soon.
Beyond that, we are preparing the launch of the full Source-to-Pay Procurement OS within the next month or so. That release will add contract lifecycle management, invoice matching, payment optimisation, and compliance monitoring to the existing skills, covering the complete procurement cycle from spend analysis through to payment.
Follow us on LinkedIn for release updates, or join the waitlist below to get notified when the full Source-to-Pay OS is ready. We will send you one email when it launches. No spam, no drip sequences, no newsletter unless you ask for it.
Skill 1: Spend Analyzer
Turn raw spend data into a categorised view with ranked savings opportunitiesSpend Analyzer is usually the first skill teams reach for, because spend visibility is usually the first thing a procurement function lacks. Most organisations have spend data sitting somewhere, like an ERP export, a P-card report, or an invoice register, but the data is messy, the category structure is informal, and pulling a clean "where are we spending" picture out of it takes a week of analyst time.
The Spend Analyzer skill takes whatever export you have, parses it, normalises supplier names, applies a category taxonomy (yours if you have one, a sensible default if you don't), flags maverick and tail spend, and surfaces ranked savings opportunities. The output is a categorised spend cube in Excel and an executive summary in Word.
/spend-analyzer
Use it when
- You have an ERP, P-card, or invoice export and want to know where the money goes
- Finance is asking for a CFO-ready spend summary
- You suspect maverick or tail spend but can't prove it
Feed it
- CSV, Excel, PDF, or pasted data with supplier name, description, amount, date
- Existing taxonomy if you have one (UNSPSC, internal categories)
- A specific question or open-ended brief
Get back
- Categorised spend cube with totals by category, supplier, business unit
- Top supplier list, maverick and tail spend flags
- Ranked savings opportunities (consolidation, demand, price variance)
- Executive summary written for non-procurement readers
Output artifacts
- Spend cube workbook (Excel)
- Executive summary (Word)
- Savings opportunity register
Try saying
Resist the urge to spend three days normalising supplier names before you upload. The skill handles inconsistent supplier records and missing categorisations better than most ETL tools. Upload it raw and iterate.
Skill 2: Category Strategy Builder
Turn a category name into a Kraljic-segmented strategy with actionable savings leversCategory strategy is the work that procurement leaders consistently say they don't have time for. It's the deliberate, deliberate planning of how a category will be sourced, segmented, and managed over a horizon of 12-24 months. Most organisations skip it. The ones that do it well usually do it with the help of an external consultant, at significant cost.
The Category Strategy Builder skill brings that work in-house. Give it a category name, a one-line objective, and any spend data you have for the category (an export, a contract list, a supplier roster, whatever is to hand). It returns a Kraljic-segmented view, supply market intelligence, three to five savings levers ranked by effort and impact, and a sourcing roadmap. The more spend data you feed in, the more the recommendations are grounded in what your organisation is actually buying instead of generic category benchmarks. You can iterate the output, push back on the recommendations, and ship a defensible category plan in an afternoon.
/category-strategy-builder
Use it when
- Planning a sourcing event and you need a defensible point of view
- Building a category management plan for the year
- Asked to lead a category review with no prior strategy on file
Feed it
- Category name and a one-line objective
- Optional: spend data, current supplier list, business constraints
- Time horizon (annual plan, 18-month roadmap, etc.)
Get back
- Kraljic segmentation (strategic, leverage, bottleneck, routine)
- Supply market intelligence and competitive structure
- Savings levers ranked by effort and impact
- Sourcing roadmap with sequencing and milestones
Output artifacts
- Category strategy document (Word)
- Segmentation matrix
- Sourcing roadmap
Try saying
Skill 3: RFP Generator
Turn a brief, contract, or SOW into an issuable RFP, RFI, or RFQWriting an RFP from a blank page is one of the most over-engineered tasks in procurement. Most teams have a template that's three years old, written by someone who's left the company, that nobody fully understands. The RFP that actually goes out the door is a Frankenstein of that template, copy-pasted clauses from the last three RFPs, and whatever the requesting business unit wrote in an email.
The RFP Generator skill replaces that with a structured pipeline: feed it your source material (SOW, contract, brief, meeting notes, or just a description) and it returns an issuable RFP, RFI, or RFQ with all the standard sections, plus a supplier cover letter, plus an evaluation scoring template aligned to what you're asking. You decide the type (RFP / RFI / RFQ); the skill handles the structure.
/rfp-generator
Use it when
- You need to issue a request to suppliers but don't want to start from scratch
- Pulling a tender pack together for a renewal
- Asked to run an RFI to scope the market before a formal RFP
Feed it
- SOW, brief, current contract, meeting notes, emails, or just a description
- Procurement type: RFP / RFI / RFQ
- Evaluation criteria preferences (or let the skill propose them)
Get back
- Issuable RFP / RFI / RFQ with all standard sections
- Supplier cover letter with timelines and submission instructions
- Evaluation scoring template aligned to the document
- Q&A guide for handling supplier clarifications
Output artifacts
- RFP / RFI / RFQ document (Word)
- Supplier cover letter
- Scoring template (Excel)
Try saying
Skill 4: RFP Response Evaluator
Score and compare supplier responses side-by-side against weighted criteriaOnce the RFP is back in, the work that follows is the work nobody wants to do. Twenty pages per supplier, multiplied by three to five suppliers, in different document formats, with answers in different orders, scattered across attachments. Comparing them line by line is the kind of work that takes a senior analyst three days and still produces a comparison everyone disagrees with.
The RFP Response Evaluator skill compresses that to a few hours. Drop the supplier responses into a folder, give the skill the original RFP, and it produces section-by-section scoring, a side-by-side comparison highlighting strengths and gaps, a ranked recommendation, and an Excel scoring grid with RAG colours. You can override weightings, ask follow-up questions about specific responses, and generate a recommendation memo that survives stakeholder scrutiny.
/rfp-response-evaluator
Use it when
- Bids are in and you need to evaluate them objectively and quickly
- Stakeholders want a defensible decision, not a gut call
- Multiple suppliers, multiple sections, no time to compare manually
Feed it
- Folder of supplier responses (Word, PDF, or Excel)
- The original RFP so it knows what to score against
- Optional: weighting overrides for specific evaluation criteria
Get back
- Section-by-section scoring per supplier
- Side-by-side comparison highlighting strengths, gaps, risks
- Ranked recommendation with reasoning
- RAG colour-coded Excel scoring grid
Output artifacts
- Evaluation report (Word)
- Scoring grid (Excel) with RAG ratings
- Recommendation memo
Try saying
Skill 5: Supplier Scorecard Engine
Design, run, and report on supplier scorecards with RAG ratings and improvement plansOnce a supplier is on the books, performance management is supposed to be the disciplined backbone of supplier relationships. In practice, it tends to be ad hoc: a quarterly review meeting where everyone shows up with their own numbers, no shared scorecard, and an action list that gets forgotten by the next quarter.
The Supplier Scorecard Engine skill builds the scorecard, runs it, and reports on it. You give it your SLA and KPI data (or describe it verbally if your data is informal) and it produces a scorecard with RAG ratings, trend analysis if historical data is provided, an improvement plan with owners and milestones, and a benchmark comparison against peers in the same category. The skill is designed to be run quarterly so that performance management stops being something everyone improvises in the meeting.
/supplier-scorecard-engine
Use it when
- Quarterly business reviews approaching
- A supplier is underperforming and you need a defensible view
- Building a scorecard from scratch for a new category or supplier
Feed it
- SLA / KPI data, performance metrics, contract terms
- Or describe verbally if your data is informal
- Benchmark expectations (or let the skill propose them)
Get back
- Supplier report card with RAG status by KPI
- Trend analysis across periods if historical data is provided
- Improvement plan with milestones and owners
- Benchmark comparison against peers in the same category
Output artifacts
- Supplier scorecard (Word)
- Performance grid (Excel)
- Improvement plan (Word)
Try saying
Skill 6: Negotiation Playbook Generator
Build a structured playbook with BATNA, levers, and counter-proposal languageNegotiation is the highest-leverage hour of work in procurement. It is also the most under-prepared. The pattern most teams fall into: you do the spend analysis, build the strategy, run the RFP, evaluate responses, run the scorecard… and then walk into the renewal meeting with a one-page summary the analyst threw together the night before. The leverage you built up in the prior six months evaporates because nobody had time to convert it into a structured playbook.
The Negotiation Playbook Generator skill exists to close that gap. You feed it the supplier proposal, your target position, the contract terms, and any market intel you have. It returns a structured playbook: a quantified BATNA, a sequenced set of negotiation levers ordered by impact, pre-drafted counter-proposal language for the contentious clauses, and a one-page briefing card you can take into the meeting itself. Used well, the skill changes the meeting itself: instead of reacting to what the supplier puts on the table, you walk in with the levers, the numbers, and the language already prepared, and you run the conversation.
/negotiation-playbook-generator
Use it when
- A renewal, contract review, or live negotiation is coming up
- You need a one-page briefing card the night before a meeting
- You want to stress-test a supplier proposal before responding
Feed it
- Supplier proposal, target position, contract terms
- Optional: market intel, internal red lines, alternative suppliers
- Negotiation context (renewal, new deal, dispute resolution)
Get back
- BATNA analysis with quantified walk-away position
- Negotiation lever sequence ordered by impact
- Counter-proposal language for the contentious clauses
- One-page briefing card for the meeting itself
Output artifacts
- Negotiation playbook (Word)
- Briefing card (one-page)
- Counter-proposal templates
Try saying
End-to-end example: the AWS renewal
A single scenario that touches all seven skillsTo show how the skills chain together, here is one scenario we have worked through in the field. Your AWS contract is up for renewal in six months. The CFO wants 15% off. You have a year of cloud invoices and a draft renewal proposal from AWS sitting on your desk.
Spend Analyzer
Run /spend-analyzer on a year of cloud invoices. The skill categorises by service line (EC2, S3, RDS, networking, support), flags non-AWS cloud spend that's quietly accumulating, and identifies under-utilised reserved instances. You walk out of the week with a categorised cube and a ranked savings register.
Category Strategy Builder
Run /category-strategy-builder for the cloud category. The skill places it in the strategic quadrant of Kraljic, runs market intelligence on the hyperscalers, and proposes three savings levers: reserved-instance optimisation, multi-cloud price tension, and right-sizing. You now have a defensible 12-month plan instead of a one-line objective.
RFP Generator (RFI mode)
Run /rfp-generator in RFI mode. You issue a short RFI to Azure and GCP. You're not switching cloud providers, but their numbers come back two weeks later. Those numbers are now market evidence, the kind that survives a meeting with the CIO.
RFP Response Evaluator
Run /rfp-response-evaluator on the Azure and GCP responses. You see exactly where AWS is uncompetitive on storage and on dedicated reserved instance discounts. The output is the comparative evidence base for the renewal conversation.
Supplier Scorecard Engine
Run /supplier-scorecard-engine on AWS. You pull historical SLA breaches, support response times, and uptime by region into a Red-Amber-Green view. There's genuine leverage on the support tier and on a couple of specific service-level commitments. The scorecard is going into the meeting as evidence.
Negotiation Playbook Generator
Run /negotiation-playbook-generator with everything above as input. You get a quantified BATNA, a sequenced set of levers (price, term, support tier, commit floor), pre-drafted counter-proposals for the renewal terms, and a one-page briefing card for the meeting itself. The CFO asks for 15%; you walk in prepared to argue for 22%.
Each skill stands alone. But chained together, they replace what would otherwise be seven separate consultant workstreams, with consistent methodology and a written audit trail at every step. The negotiation conversation goes from "we need a discount" to "here is the data, here is the market evidence, here is the leverage, here is what we expect." That conversation has a different outcome.
How the Procurement OS fits with the Cowork Playbook
Strategic framework, working operating systemIf you have already read The Claude Cowork Playbook for Procurement Teams, the Procurement OS will feel like the natural next step. The playbook makes the case that procurement teams should build skills, automate analyst-time work, and govern AI use carefully. The Procurement OS is seven of those skills, pre-built, ready to install.
If you haven't read the playbook, you can still use the Procurement OS perfectly well, since it stands on its own. But the playbook gives you the wider context: how Cowork works as a platform, how to manage credits, how to roll Cowork out across a team, how to build governance around it, and how to plan a 30/60/90-day adoption arc. The two documents are designed to be read together.
The Cowork Playbook covers
- What Cowork is and how it differs from other Claude products
- Pricing model and credit management
- Connectors and integrations
- Team rollout and governance
- 30/60/90 adoption roadmap
- Prompt guides for seven procurement roles
The Procurement OS covers
- Seven pre-built skills covering Source-to-Contract end to end (six live, one in testing)
- Slash commands for fast invocation
- Persistent configuration per skill
- Templated outputs (Word, Excel)
- Skill-to-skill chaining for end-to-end workflows
- An installable bundle that works in Claude Code or Claude Cowork
The simplest way to use them together: read the Cowork Playbook to understand the operating model and the platform; install the Procurement OS to put the operating model into practice on day one.
Installation & first run
From download to your first skill in under fifteen minutesThe Procurement OS ships as a single bundle file: m1-procurement-os-v1.0.0.skill. You install it once. After that, the seven skills appear in any conversation in Claude Code or in the Project where you uploaded them.
In Claude Code
- Open Claude Code (terminal or desktop app).
- Run
/install-pluginor go to Settings, then Plugins, then Install from file. - Select the bundle file:
m1-procurement-os-v1.0.0.skill. - Restart Claude Code (or open a new chat).
- Type
/. The seven skills should appear in the autocomplete.
In Claude Cowork
- Open Claude Cowork and select the workspace where you want the skills available.
- Go to Customize, then Plugins, then Browse and Install.
- Upload the bundle file
m1-procurement-os-v1.0.0.skill. - All seven skills load into the workspace automatically.
Detailed step-by-step instructions are in the official Anthropic documentation: Claude Code plugin install guide and Claude Cowork skills guide.
First run setup
The first time you use any skill, Claude will ask a few short setup questions: your organisation name, your primary currency, your ERP system, your financial year start month, and your spend taxonomy if you have one. Answers are saved to config.json inside the skill folder and reused on every future run. If anything changes, just tell Claude in conversation: "Update my settings, we've moved to NetSuite." No file editing required.
Make sure you're selecting the bundle file (the one with the .skill extension), not the folder it sits in. Restart Claude Code after install. If the skills still don't appear, type / in a new chat. Autocomplete usually surfaces them once a chat opens.
The full user guide
The bundle ships with a 7-page user guide PDF that covers installation, every skill in detail, an end-to-end example, and a troubleshooting section. The guide and the bundle are both in the download below.
Get the Procurement OS
Free for procurement teams. One install. Seven skills.The Procurement OS v1.0 is available now. The download includes the user guide PDF and the installable plugin bundle. Drop your work email below to access both.
The Procurement OS v1.0
Seven AI skills covering the full Source-to-Contract lifecycle (six live, one in testing). Installs in Claude Code or Claude Cowork. Free for procurement teams. Yours to run, modify, and build on.
What happens next
- You install it. Five minutes in Claude Code, two minutes in Claude Cowork.
- You run your first skill. Not sure where to start? Take our AI Readiness Assessment first. Otherwise, we recommend starting with
/spend-analyzerif you have spend data on hand, or/negotiation-playbook-generatorif you have a renewal coming up. Both produce a usable artifact in under an hour. - You tell us what worked. We are continuously improving the skills based on real procurement use. Email hello@moleculeone.ai with what worked, what didn't, and what you wish was there.
Read The Claude Cowork Playbook for Procurement Teams. It covers the operating model: what Cowork is, how to manage credits, how to roll AI out across a procurement function, and a 30/60/90-day adoption plan. The Procurement OS is the working implementation; the playbook is the strategic frame.
Need help with rollout?
If you want help installing, configuring, or rolling the Procurement OS out across a procurement team, our AI procurement consulting team offers implementation support: installation, custom skill development, and governance setup. We also run AI training for procurement teams: hands-on workshops that get your analysts productive with the OS in days, not weeks. Email hello@moleculeone.ai or visit moleculeone.ai/contact.